Why L Brands’ $1.1 Billion Price Tag For Victoria’s Secret Looks Too Low

LB: LandBridge Co logo
LB
LandBridge Co

L Brands (NYSE: LB) entered into a deal with private equity firm Sycamore Partners recently under which Victoria’s Secret will be separated from L Brands into a privately-held company that is majority-owned by Sycamore. The deal assigns a total enterprise value of $1.1 billion to Victoria’s Secret. Sycamore will purchase a 55% interest in Victoria’s Secret for approximately $525 million, with L Brands retaining a 45% stake in the brand.

Although the deal is a good move by L Brands, we believe that the company has sold the iconic brand for much less than what it is worth. Trefis, in its interactive dashboard, analyzes Why L Brands Sold Victoria’s Secrets At A Discount.

 

Relevant Articles
  1. What’s Next For Gap Stock?
  2. What’s Driving Altria Stock Higher?
  3. What’s Next For HIMS Stock?
  4. Buy, Sell, Or Hold Deere Stock?
  5. Is The Worst Over For Super Micro Stock?
  6. Pick Honeywell Over 3M Stock?

Why do we think the sale was at a discount?

P/S Multiple of the deal is relatively low as compared to L Brands’ Trailing Twelve Months (TTM) P/S Multiple

  • L Brands has sold the brand for a total enterprise value of $1.1 billion, implying a P/S multiple of 0.16x (assuming 2019 revenues of $6.9 billion).
  • However, P/S multiple of the L Brands for the Trailing Twelve Months (TTM) has been around 0.52. This translates to a 70% discount to L Brands’ TTM multiple.

Moreover, P/S Multiple of the deal is well below the TTM multiple of the competitors

 

Why Did L Brands Sell The Brand At A Discount?

#1. Lack of Revenue Growth

  • Despite contributing the largest chunk of L Brands’ revenues, the brand’s growth has slumped over the last few years.
  • Victoria’s Secret has lost nearly $400 million in total revenue since 2016 at an average annual rate of 2.6%,
  • Moreover, the segment’s share has declined from 62% in 2016 to less than 56% in 2018 due to faster growth in the Bath & Body Works segment.
  • We expect the segment sales would have declined by 6.4% (y-o-y) in 2019 to $6.9 billion due to inferior merchandise performance in loungewear, declines in sports bras, and the exit of the swim business.

#2. Victoria’s Secret Profits Have Tumbled

  • Victoria’s Secret operating income has steeply declined over the years, falling from $1.4 billion in 2015 to just $462 million in 2018.
  • This has resulted in the brand’s operating margin declining from 18.1% to 6.3% over the same period.
  • This decline can be attributed to lower gross margin resulting from increased promotional activity to drive traffic and clear inventory.
  • Additionally, this was exacerbated by store impairment charges incurred in 2018.
  • The brand has been struggling off lately, and we expect the brand’s profits to take a hit in FY 2019 further.

#3. L Brands’ Ballooning Debt Was Another Major Reason Forcing The Sale

  • One of the major reasons that the company was eager to lay off its iconic brand has been its swelling debt. As of 2018, debt was nearly 45% of the company’s total revenues.
  • Moreover, as of Q3 2019, L Brands’ total debt stood at nearly $5.6 billion, implying a leverage ratio of 0.74.
  • The company stated that it intends to use the proceeds from the transaction, along with approximately $500 million in excess balance sheet cash, to reduce its debt.

 

What Looks Like A Fair Value For Victoria’s Secret?

  • We believe the company sold the brand at a discount. Although the brand was struggling, it had revenues of more than $7 billion in 2018.
  • As per Trefis, the brand should have been worth around $1.8 billion, which is nearly 60% more than the current deal value.
  • Our methodology assumes FY 2019 revenues of $6.9 billion and a P/S multiple of 0.26. Our P/S multiple assumes a haircut of 50% from the current TTM P/S as we believe that the Bath & Body Works represents a bulk of the company’s valuation.

 

See all Trefis Price Estimates and Download Trefis Data here

What’s behind Trefis? See How It’s Powering New Collaboration and What-Ifs For CFOs and Finance Teams | Product, R&D, and Marketing Teams